The Minister of
Finance introduced his budget to parliament on 22 February 2017. During the
course of the budget it was announced that the dividends tax would be increased
from 15% to 20%.
In the case of
foreign dividends the rate of tax will increase to 20% with effect from 1 March
2017.
This is by virtue of the fact that foreign dividends are not subject to
withholding tax and it is only possible for taxpayers to report foreign
dividends in the tax return to be filed by them which will, in most cases, cover
the period 1 March 2017 to 28 February 2018. Thus, the new tax rate will apply
in respect of foreign dividends received by affected taxpayers on or after 1
March 2017.
However, in the case
of dividends from which dividends tax must be withheld, the adjusted rate will
apply in respect of dividends paid on or after 22 February 2017.
The Draft Rates and
Monetary Amounts and Amendment of Revenue Laws Bill, 2017 was released on 22
February 2017 and that legislation contains amendments giving effect to the various
adjustments in tax rates announced in the National Budget. Clause 11 of the draft
Bill makes it clear that the adjustment in the dividend withholding tax is
deemed to have come into operation 22 February 2017 and applies in respect of
any dividend paid on or after 22 February 2017.
Section 64E of the
Income Tax Act 58 of 1962, as amended, provides that in the a case of a
dividend, other than an award of an asset in
specie, declared by a company that is a listed company, is deemed to be
paid on the date on which the dividend is paid. In the case of a company which
is not listed it is deemed to be paid on the earlier of the date on which the
dividend is paid or becomes due and payable.
It is therefore
important to consider what is meant by the date on which a dividend can be said
to have been paid in the case of an unlisted company.
In ITC1688 [1999],62
SATC 478 the Tax Court was required to determine whether the dividends declared
by a company were liable to the erstwhile secondary tax on companies (STC). In
ITC 1688 the company declared a dividend on 2 March 1992 and a further dividend
on 5 March 1993, that is prior to 17 March 1993, the date on which STC took
effect. In neither case was the payment of the dividend made in cash or by
cheque.
Mr A left the money
on loan with the company and his loan account in the company’s was simply
credited. In the case of both dividends the actual crediting of the loan
account was only effected on 31 July 1993 which was after the introduction of
STC. The Commissioner: SARS contended that payment took place on the date on
which Mr A’ s loan account was in fact credited. That is to say on 31 July
1993, that is after the introduction of STC and thus issued STC’s assessments
to the company reflecting tax payable.
Galgut J reached the
conclusion that based on the wording of the company’s two resolutions and based
on a proper construction of all the facts that it had been intended to record
that the dividends concerned would not be paid in cash or by cheque but would be
retained by the company as a loan. The court therefore reached the conclusion
that the dividend was paid as required even though it was not in cash or by
cheque, before the introduction of STC.
Subsequently, in the Supreme Court of Appeal case of Commissioner: SARS v Scribante Construction (Pty) Ltd ([2002], 64 SATC 379) in
which judgment was delivered on 14 May 2002 Heher AJA delivering judgment for the
unanimous court stated as follows:
“ I have already referred to the uncontested practice of the shareholders in using the company as a banker. In that context the crediting of the loan accounts constituted an actual payment as if the dividends had been deposited into an account held by a shareholder at a banking institution”.
“ I have already referred to the uncontested practice of the shareholders in using the company as a banker. In that context the crediting of the loan accounts constituted an actual payment as if the dividends had been deposited into an account held by a shareholder at a banking institution”.
The Supreme Court of Appeal has therefore decided that dividends will
be regarded as paid when those amounts are credited to a shareholder’s loan
account making it clear that it is not necessary to pay a dividend in cash.
Clearly, with the dividends tax rate being increased from 15% - 20%
SARS has a concern that unscrupulous taxpayers may seek to backdate dividends
to escape the increased rate of tax. Where taxpayers seek to fabricate
resolutions purportedly giving effect to
decisions which were not actually made prior to 22 February 2017, such conduct
constitutes tax evasion and will face the full might of the law and the imposition
of penalties.
Image purchased www.iStock.com ©iStock.com |
SARS has indicated that it will audit all dividends paid shortly before
the increase in rate to ensure the lawfulness thereof. Where, however, the
shareholders of a company passed a proper resolution declaring a dividend,
having satisfied themselves as to the solvency and liquidity of the company as
required under the Companies Act, the shareholders have a claim against the
company for such dividend and will be entitled, based on the case law, to pay
the dividends tax at the rate of 15% where such resolution was properly adopted
prior to 22 February 2017.
Based on ITC 1688 it does not appear that the dividend
must have been recorded in the books of account prior to 22 February 2017. The
courts require that the resolution must have been properly passed giving the
shareholder an unconditional right to claim the dividend against the company
which would confirm that the dividend has been paid as required under section
64E of the Act.
National Treasury indicated at the Standing Committee on Finance
hearings on the National Budget that it may seek to amend section 64E such that
it will be required that the dividend must in fact be paid in cash and not only
credited to a shareholder’s loan account. Such an amendment would be
retrospective and should be resisted on the basis that it violates the rule of
law and the certainty required under the Constitution of the Republic of South
Africa.
Taxpayers need to consider their position and seek appropriate advice
knowing that SARS will no doubt audit and investigate dividends declared
particularly in February and credited to loan accounts before 22 February 2017 in
light of the substantial increase in the rate of dividends tax from 15% – 20 %.
Dr Beric Croome is a Tax Executive at ENSafrica. This article first appeared in Business Day, Business Law and Tax Review, April 2017. Image purchased www.iStock.com ©iStock.com/